It's just too easy!
I was researching the furl site and I came across Clipmasters, it's a site that makes breaching copyright all too easy. Where content for the web was once the domain of the web designer and coders, it's now just a matter to cut from the source and paste into your blog. Tools that make somethings too easy are sometimes not good for us.
Showing posts with label copyright. Show all posts
Showing posts with label copyright. Show all posts
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Friday, April 3, 2009
Curtin logo use part 2
The definitive answer
Under the Curtin Policies and Procedures page on the web site you can download the "Logo Use Procedures". Under point 5.5 subsection 3 is states:
Reference:
Logo Use Procedures. (2004). Retrieved April 3, 2009, from http://policies.curtin.edu.au/local/includes/getdoc.cfm?url=https://ecm.curtin.edu.au:443/alfresco/gd/d/workspace/SpacesStore/116ebc3d-ff02-11dd-92c2-39e23a1f1a54/Logo%20Use%20Procedures.html?guest=true&policyId=959f55ad-fec2-11dc-b6c5-253dc30d60f2
Under the Curtin Policies and Procedures page on the web site you can download the "Logo Use Procedures". Under point 5.5 subsection 3 is states:
"External requests for the use of the logo must be addressed to University Marketing in writing. In"External requests" are defined in section 4 as:
making a case the applicant for the use of the logo must state:
the purpose of the use of the logo;
the proposed format of the use of the logo; and
the date(s) or periods when the logo will be used."(Logo Use Procedures, 2004)
"Outside AgenciesSo the first answer is NO but if you ask real nicely it maybe a little yes.
Includes students, staff and organisations whether or not affiliated with Curtin." (Logo Use Procedures, 2004)
Reference:
Logo Use Procedures. (2004). Retrieved April 3, 2009, from http://policies.curtin.edu.au/local/includes/getdoc.cfm?url=https://ecm.curtin.edu.au:443/alfresco/gd/d/workspace/SpacesStore/116ebc3d-ff02-11dd-92c2-39e23a1f1a54/Logo%20Use%20Procedures.html?guest=true&policyId=959f55ad-fec2-11dc-b6c5-253dc30d60f2
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Curtin logo use
Yes another post for today.
I found the information regarding the use of Curtin Uni logo, it was hiding in someone's blog. see LavaTiger. (gee they make it difficult to find things at the uni.) This ties in with my post on the future direction of emails see post. The collective working as a group is far more efficient than the individual. I'm sure I saved lots of time not searching the Curtin site to thoroughly but getting the info from another NET11'er who was luckier in their searches than I was. Great work LavaTiger!
Individual thought wins again, or is that collective?
I found the information regarding the use of Curtin Uni logo, it was hiding in someone's blog. see LavaTiger. (gee they make it difficult to find things at the uni.) This ties in with my post on the future direction of emails see post. The collective working as a group is far more efficient than the individual. I'm sure I saved lots of time not searching the Curtin site to thoroughly but getting the info from another NET11'er who was luckier in their searches than I was. Great work LavaTiger!
Individual thought wins again, or is that collective?
Copyright—How much money do you have?
Only fools tread where copyright lawyers are keen to prosecute
I don't pretend to be a copyright lawyer but it would appear from the copyright website that if I intend to use the Curtin logo on my blog I need to show that I have "Fair Use" rights.
The Fair Use rights are:
(Fair Use Visualizer, n.d.)
But if your still not sure you can ring a lawyer.
(ask a Lawyer, n.d.)
I wonder, if you end up going to court do the lawyer uses the "Fair Use Visualizer" and will it depend on how much you pay the lawyer to how far he spins the wheel.
You can avoid the problem altogether and just purchase an image from one of the may image libraries such as istock for as little as $1 for web use, granted it's not the Curtin logo.
As for using the Curtin logo on my blog it would appear from the dial a rights (wheel of fortune) that I could use the logo if I argued "Fair Use" under the terms of not for profit educational purposes. However, if the Uni decided that I have used the logo inappropriately that somehow degrades or devalues the logo by associating my work with the Uni, then the Uni may have other views. You know the saying, all views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Uni.
So in answering this I tried to find the information on the Curtin web site but had no luck, so sent an email to the Vice Chancellor office to ask permission to use the Curtin logo on my blog, I'll post the response when I receive it.
Well I just received the first response and that was:
So for the independent thought criteria—if I real need to use the Curtin logo on my blog with the accompanying defamatory text that's scandalous, then I would publish the blog somewhere on a pacific island like Vanuatu or the Cocos islands where international law is clouded by the beautiful blue sea.
And NO, I haven't breached any copyright law with my images, (I think) I used my camera in public space. As for the screen shots, hell I don't know, I suspect if it's used for educational purposes then it's probably fine.
Reference:
Copyright Website. (2009). Retrieved April 2, 2009, from http://www.benedict.com/Info/Info.aspx
Fair Use Visualizer [image] (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2009, http://www.benedict.com/Info/FairUse/Visualizer/Visualizer.aspx
ask a Lawyer [image] (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2009, http://www.benedict.com/Info/FairUse/Visualizer
I don't pretend to be a copyright lawyer but it would appear from the copyright website that if I intend to use the Curtin logo on my blog I need to show that I have "Fair Use" rights.
The Fair Use rights are:
- "the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- the nature of the copyrighted work;
- the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work." (Copyright website, 2009)

But if your still not sure you can ring a lawyer.

I wonder, if you end up going to court do the lawyer uses the "Fair Use Visualizer" and will it depend on how much you pay the lawyer to how far he spins the wheel.
You can avoid the problem altogether and just purchase an image from one of the may image libraries such as istock for as little as $1 for web use, granted it's not the Curtin logo.
As for using the Curtin logo on my blog it would appear from the dial a rights (wheel of fortune) that I could use the logo if I argued "Fair Use" under the terms of not for profit educational purposes. However, if the Uni decided that I have used the logo inappropriately that somehow degrades or devalues the logo by associating my work with the Uni, then the Uni may have other views. You know the saying, all views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Uni.
So in answering this I tried to find the information on the Curtin web site but had no luck, so sent an email to the Vice Chancellor office to ask permission to use the Curtin logo on my blog, I'll post the response when I receive it.
Well I just received the first response and that was:
Dear Lawrence,I think finding the answer to using the Curtin logo will be problematic and just lead me on another wild goose chase.
Thank you for contacting OASIS Central.
As you are a Open University student please contact Open Curtin directly regarding this enquiry.
Open Curtin: +61 8 9266 2102 , opencurtin@curtin.edu.au
Kind Regards,
Louise (Louise, personal communication, April 2, 2009)
So for the independent thought criteria—if I real need to use the Curtin logo on my blog with the accompanying defamatory text that's scandalous, then I would publish the blog somewhere on a pacific island like Vanuatu or the Cocos islands where international law is clouded by the beautiful blue sea.
And NO, I haven't breached any copyright law with my images, (I think) I used my camera in public space. As for the screen shots, hell I don't know, I suspect if it's used for educational purposes then it's probably fine.
Reference:
Copyright Website. (2009). Retrieved April 2, 2009, from http://www.benedict.com/Info/Info.aspx
Fair Use Visualizer [image] (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2009, http://www.benedict.com/Info/FairUse/Visualizer/Visualizer.aspx
ask a Lawyer [image] (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2009, http://www.benedict.com/Info/FairUse/Visualizer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)